case in point.
2003 Ford F-250 SD with 7.3L PS diesel pickup, extended cab, long bed, 158" wheel base. VIN tags show Gross at 8800.. but the axles weight, front 5200, back 6084 = 11284 LBS, is quite a bit higher than gross..
now look at this.
2003 Ford Excursion with 7.3L PS diesel SUV, 137 Wheel base, VIN gross 9200, front 4700, back 5250 = 9950 LBS, which is just slightly above gross on tag..
What gives..
On SD, vin shows transmission as 9, axle as C1,
excursion trans is a B and axle C1.
so why the big difference in gross and axle total weight.. too me it appears the SD is underrated on gross by 1000 lbs or better.. :huh:
info is from this SD, http://www.autowarehousesalesnservic...spx?id=4545377
and this excursion, http://www.autowarehousesalesnservic...spx?id=4666199
2003 Ford F-250 SD with 7.3L PS diesel pickup, extended cab, long bed, 158" wheel base. VIN tags show Gross at 8800.. but the axles weight, front 5200, back 6084 = 11284 LBS, is quite a bit higher than gross..
now look at this.
2003 Ford Excursion with 7.3L PS diesel SUV, 137 Wheel base, VIN gross 9200, front 4700, back 5250 = 9950 LBS, which is just slightly above gross on tag..
What gives..
On SD, vin shows transmission as 9, axle as C1,
excursion trans is a B and axle C1.
so why the big difference in gross and axle total weight.. too me it appears the SD is underrated on gross by 1000 lbs or better.. :huh:
info is from this SD, http://www.autowarehousesalesnservic...spx?id=4545377
and this excursion, http://www.autowarehousesalesnservic...spx?id=4666199
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire